Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Study: Banning Abortion Leads To Higher Maternal Deaths

Researchers focused on how maternal mortality is impacted by abortion in the study because data shows staying pregnant carries a higher risk of death than having an abortion.

In Wyoming, hundreds show up to protest the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade. Photo from Larry Wolfe’s Twitter account @WYWolfe.

KUALA LUMPUR, July 1 – New data shows that banning abortion would lead to more maternal deaths than previously thought, a critical finding less than a week after the Supreme Court ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade. 

According to new research from the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) based on newly available data from 2020, such a ban would increase maternal mortality by 24 per cent, a 14 per cent increase from the previous data from 2017.

In this study, researchers focused only on how maternal mortality is impacted by abortion simply because data shows staying pregnant carries a higher risk of death than having an abortion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 0.41 deaths per 100,000 legal abortions between 2013-18 and that the maternal mortality rate was 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2020.

Other factors, like how society will facilitate access to abortion for those living in states where it is illegal or how criminalisation will impact health care seeking, were not factored in. 

“The prior estimates relied on abortion rates, births and maternal mortality rates as of five years ago. Since then, abortions have increased, births have decreased and maternal mortality rates have worsened,” said Amanda Stevenson, an assistant professor of sociology at CU Boulder and lead author of the paper.

Stevenson and coauthors Leslie Root and Jane Menken — all researchers in the Institute of Behavioral Science — estimate that in the first year following a nationwide abortion ban, the number of maternal deaths would increase from a baseline of 861 to 969 (a 13 per cent increase). In subsequent years, maternal deaths would increase 210 over baseline, a 24 per cent increase. 

For black people, the numbers are even more alarming: the expected increase in maternal deaths if abortion were to be banned in every state jumped 18 per cent to 39 per cent.

“There is a robust network of black-led research demonstrating how we can better support black pregnant people who are at two to three times greater risk of dying because they’re pregnant compared to other groups,” Stevenson said. 

When looking specifically at the 26 states that have already banned or plan to ban abortion following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, researchers found a lot of variation. In states with already high maternal mortality and moderate to high abortion rates — like Florida and Georgia — researchers estimate maternal deaths to increase by 29 per cent. 

In contrast, states like Nebraska, Missouri, and West Virginia which have already made it difficult to get an abortion are expected to see little to no change just due to the increased risks of staying pregnant. 

Researchers estimate that if no abortions were permitted in these 26 states in 2020 there would have been 64 more mortality-related deaths. The new findings have not yet been peer reviewed.

To combat this alarming trend, researchers say helping people in states where abortion is illegal obtain legal access to reproductive care, investing in the maternal health crisis, and addressing the shocking inequalities that generate astronomically high levels of maternal mortality are all ways to better support pregnant people in the US.

“Our estimates highlight how we can prevent the post-Dobbs bans on abortion from increasing the already tragically high numbers of deaths due to pregnancy in the US,” Stevenson said. “Pregnancy shouldn’t kill people — in fact in other rich countries it very rarely does.”

Post-Dobbs refers to the case of Dobbs vs Jackson in Mississippi, which concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The case was used by the state as a means to get the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v Wade.

You May Also Like

Opinion

In a review of International Women's Month, MWGF says policies, while well-intentioned, may lack a holistic gender lens. It is therefore vital to ensure...

Opinion

The recent shooting incident at KLIA 1 serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need to address violence against women in our society,...

World

India's new code throws into doubt whether its citizens are truly protected from the arbitrary exercise of power by public officials.

World

The sanctity of a marriage provides no protection to interfaith couples and those in live-in relationships are even more vulnerable.